Now, add to that more than 20 simultaneous visitors. Each page will need 50 or more resources and the total size could easily exceed 1 MB.
People would use WordPress or Joomla or Drupal to setup a website, and make it beautiful using several modules and images.Īll those files make a website heavy. This is the most common category of website that we’ve seen. Instead I’ll tell you several stories of our customers who wanted to replace Apache, and what we found ideal for them.Ĭase 1 : Static content (image, CSS, JS, etc.) heavy website Litespeed vs Apache for business websites I’ll take a chance and assume that you are not a tech guru, and is here for business advice. So, I’ll spare you the tech talk and tech specifications of each Web server. Yes, LiteSpeed is indeed a viable drop-in replace to Apache, but it might be an overkill for many.īut, before that, let’s lay some ground rules. People usually look for Litespeed vs Apache because Apache has been performing poorly lately, and no amount of setting changes seem to fix it. Looking at how well Litespeed compares with Apache. Unless you really dig in and look for alternatives, you are not likely to even know about Litespeed.īut still, here you are.
It’s a classic tale of the Reigning Champion vs the New Comer.Įvery Linux web server comes pre-installed with Apache.